FDA TRansparency Blog Header www.hhs.gov www.hhs.gov FDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration FDA Transparency Blog

« How Can FDA Use its Website to Improve Transparency at the Agency? | Main | For Further Discussion -- Comment from the Public About Transparency »

July 15, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e0097fa000883301157114306e970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Comment on the Sentinel Initiative:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The Brain

Eric,

Don't you have any more capital letters behind your name?

Gee Whiz! It never occurred to anyone to look around our government and see if there are already other agencies who have such a system. You know what I mean. Letting the left hand know what the right hand is doing. Hmmm, maybe the Veterans Health Administration has such a system called VistA? Nah, that would be too easy and would reduce our budget for next year. We need to spend money to help speed the recovery of the economy. Besides, VistA software is already Public Domain Software and is going to be incorporated into the new National Healthcare Plan. We need to reinvent the wheel and then create a new agency to integrate all the seperate softwares into one system. WE WILL NEED A NEW "IT" CZAR in 2011! Hire a Vet!

TSC

To be fair to the FDA, it seems to me that they did look at what other agencies "have such a system". They just looked across the pond, and found that MHRA (the UK counterpart of the FDA) runs something similar (for example, see here http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2005_July_22/ai_n14813770/ ). MHRA system is also called Sentinel, and MHRA seems to be quite happy with it (see http://www.publictechnology.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=19286&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 and http://www.dgra.de/fortbildung/pdf/kongresse/2007/kongr2007-wheeler.pdf )

On the other hand, VistA is just an electronic health record system, and it is not at all clear how it could serve the agency needs. It will probably require extensive customization. Why reinvent the wheel?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Eric,

Don't you have any more capital letters behind your name?

Gee Whiz! It never occurred to anyone to look around our government and see if there are already other agencies who have such a system. You know what I mean. Letting the left hand know what the right hand is doing. Hmmm, maybe the Veterans Health Administration has such a system called VistA? Nah, that would be too easy and would reduce our budget for next year. We need to spend money to help speed the recovery of the economy. Besides, VistA software is already Public Domain Software and is going to be incorporated into the new National Healthcare Plan. We need to reinvent the wheel and then create a new agency to integrate all the seperate softwares into one system. WE WILL NEED A NEW "IT" CZAR in 2011! Hire a Vet!

Posted by: The Brain | July 23, 2009 at 04:30 AM

To be fair to the FDA, it seems to me that they did look at what other agencies "have such a system". They just looked across the pond, and found that MHRA (the UK counterpart of the FDA) runs something similar (for example, see here http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2005_July_22/ai_n14813770/ ). MHRA system is also called Sentinel, and MHRA seems to be quite happy with it (see http://www.publictechnology.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=19286&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 and http://www.dgra.de/fortbildung/pdf/kongresse/2007/kongr2007-wheeler.pdf )

On the other hand, VistA is just an electronic health record system, and it is not at all clear how it could serve the agency needs. It will probably require extensive customization. Why reinvent the wheel?

Posted by: TSC | July 24, 2009 at 04:51 PM