FDA TRansparency Blog Header www.hhs.gov www.hhs.gov FDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration FDA Transparency Blog

« For Further Discussion -- Comment from the Public About Transparency #2 | Main | Join the Conversation: Meeting with the Risk Communication Advisory Committee to Discuss Product Recalls »

August 12, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e0097fa00088330120a541ceab970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference FDA Transparency Initiative: Meeting Held to Discuss Opportunities for FDA to Foster Innovation:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

TSC

Is there a transcript or recording? It is desirable for a meeting on transparency to be transparent.

Matt

Why was industry the only group really represented in this meeting? What about civil society, patient groups, and the public at large? I strongly doubt that they have nothing to say on these issues.

I would have attended this meeting had it been conducted (ironically) in a transparent and accessible way.

TSC

Although this meeting was called a "meeting with investors", a few of the participants are not investors. Rather, they represent biotech industry itself. For example,

Michael Doherty is a Global Head, Pharma Regulatory Affairs at Hoffman-la Roche (not Genentech). According to his public Linked-in profile, he resides in Switzerland.

Barry Eisenstein is a biotech company Cubist Senior Vice President for Scientific Affairs.

John Griffin is a Chief Scientific Officer and Principal Investigator of the Project at a biotech Numerate.

It is surprising to see these people characterized as investors.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Is there a transcript or recording? It is desirable for a meeting on transparency to be transparent.

Posted by: TSC | August 12, 2009 at 04:51 PM

Why was industry the only group really represented in this meeting? What about civil society, patient groups, and the public at large? I strongly doubt that they have nothing to say on these issues.

I would have attended this meeting had it been conducted (ironically) in a transparent and accessible way.

Posted by: Matt | August 13, 2009 at 10:55 AM

Although this meeting was called a "meeting with investors", a few of the participants are not investors. Rather, they represent biotech industry itself. For example,

Michael Doherty is a Global Head, Pharma Regulatory Affairs at Hoffman-la Roche (not Genentech). According to his public Linked-in profile, he resides in Switzerland.

Barry Eisenstein is a biotech company Cubist Senior Vice President for Scientific Affairs.

John Griffin is a Chief Scientific Officer and Principal Investigator of the Project at a biotech Numerate.

It is surprising to see these people characterized as investors.

Posted by: TSC | August 17, 2009 at 07:44 PM